Monday, February 26, 2007

The mark of the Beast is not there, but here...

My dear readers, today I had a looot of free time to waste in front of the internet... nevertheless, I am not getting tired of all the news you can get from Venezuela.

"A recent request by socialist Venezuelean President Hugo Chávez to pay an official visit to a Chabad synagogue in Caracas was rejected.

The Chabad official news site posted an article saying that Rabbi Moshe Ferman, the chief Chabad envoy to Venezuela, had rejected the president's request arguing that it was aimed at garnering political gains in light of the West's revulsion of him."

Good for Rabbi Ferman. Let's wait and see what's gonna be Hugo's reaction to the Rabbi...

I dunno, to me he is the Antichrist.

Really.

Not, it's not this one... (I know, today I had much of a free time today)



That one is only another stupid ass in the world.

But this one who do this to these two poor chavistorras who wanted to buy meat at the "Mercal" market (click on the pict for news in spanish)...













They needed to be marked as if they were cattle in order to buy groceries at the "Mercal" supermarket. That is, if you still show the mark of the beast, then probably you don't need to buy more groceries until the ink goes away. These pair armed a safarrancho(*) in the store so one of the cashiers had to call the police and they were taking away. So, if you want to buy groceries in Venezuela you will have to face the mark of the beast or else... going to the police.

You know what? These two look like chavistas, so maybe they have a share of the fault on why this is happening. Nevertheless, it's heinous, denigrant, inmoral. And, I am very sorry that this type of situations are happening in a country, my country, which is full of freaking OIL!!!!

(*) Safarrancho is a very loud disagreement and/or complain that can turn into violence.

If Jesus were a XXI Century Socialist...

This is one of the funniest cartoons I have ever read...



It reads below... "If Jesus were a XXI Century Socialist". Then Jesus says: "I am the only one capable of leading this revolution, Peter it is better if you go to the cross now..."

Roberto Weil you are the Bomb!!

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Connecting the recent dots...

1) "Elsewhere, Venezuela has revealed how it deals with countries with governments that speak critically of Mr. Chávez. Venezuela shut an aluminum plant in Costa Rica with 400 employees last week after Óscar Arias, Costa Rica’s president, criticized Mr. Chávez’s recently acquired power to govern by decree."

2) "Venezuela’s arms spending has climbed to more than $4 billion in the past two years, transforming the nation into Latin America’s largest weapons buyer and placing it ahead of other major purchasers in international arms markets like Pakistan and Iran."

Chavez is starting to resemble too much to a mentally sick person who hear voices everywhere armed with a weapon ready to shot whatever that moves, because inside his sick little brain it's ALL about him. You see, If Bush wants to meet with Lula, Chavez thinks this meeting it's all about him. If Bush wants to decrease America's oil consumption, then Chavez thinks is a plot to kill him, if somebody farts in Caracas, he thinks that was dedicated to him too.

See, if you are following the news recently, his eternal one sided fight with Pres. Bush, the way he attacked this poor Brazilian journalist, the way he is enforcing his personal vendetta with Marcel Granier and Laureano Marquez... now Oscar Arias and the people of Costa Rica are his newest recent victims... and then let's talk about the weapons buy... he is loading himself with guns like crazy... you can understand where this is going. He will come into the donut shop at noon time loaded with a shotgun and start killing everybody in the name of his social justice or whatever he says at the moment.

I mean, I am starting to feel really sorry for the people who really believe in him or the people that for x, y or z, have to deal with this guy on a daily basis. I mean, it's their fault, but still...

On top of this paranoia, Chavez can't separate the country with himself. Neither he can't separate the treasury and oil that belongs to the country as it is his personal property. Hello??

Now, read this cherry on the top:

"Chavez said he respected the decision by other Latin American nations to "receive this little gentleman," but in Venezuela, "we will never receive him. Never. Because we know what he is. This is nothing personal."

WTF? Nothing personal? He sounds much more like a resentful bride who has been left out all alone at the altar. Wasn't he invited to the prom but he "respects" the girlfriend who was invited by the object of his affection? Sorry but this is too much! I think it was the Bush administration that did close the door of meeting with Chavismo and trow the key many years ago. I praise them for having been very clear into separating the country Venezuela, with the madness of this idiot. What's the point of such painful declaration? I starting to feel sorry for Hugo Chavez now. Geez! C'mon man! Have some dignity at least!

Tyrants don't dialogue ...and don't hold fair elections.

Daniel wrote today and excellent post about Hugo Chavez totally getting into the face of a poor Brazilian journalist who had the bad luck to work for red O'Globo. I said poor luck, because Hugo attacked him on the basis that he worked for O'Globo instead of answering on a professional manner the journalist question,... the attack when on a on and touched a variety of topics such as Lula, soccer, get me another coffee pués (he asked for it like that), O'Globo rancid right wing oligarchs who own it (is this true?) and etc, etc, etc... but of course, he never answered the young man's question about why his government is closing the oldest and most dear TV station of Venezuela, RCTV and why it also has fined the humorist editorial of Laureano Marquez, very important freedom of speech topic that normally any journalist would be interested into writing about it.

I have the answer for the ones of you who don't understand why Chavez really couldn't answered that question. The answer is because he has a personal vendetta with Marcel Granier (the president of the TV station RCTV), and because he also has taken on a personal way the humorism of Laureano Marquez regarding the stupidity of Chavez mentioning on a TV speech that her daughter suggested to his daddy to change the coat of arms of the country, and he was talking seriously the idea of changing it due to Rosines's ideas. I mean, c'mon, how are you not gonna make fun of such comment coming from a public persona, the president? Hello? See, it is totally tyrant-style to get into personal fights with whoever dares to come into the tyrant way, and since he owns the power for the moment, abuse this power and do whatever he wants to fuck this people to the max.

Now, think about this for a moment, watch the videos that Daniel put in his blog, do you think a sick person like Chavez, with an electoral council controlled by his own trusting people, would have had fair elections? Measure himself, the supreme divinity of Venezuela, with us own mortals' power of vote? Exactly. He wouldn't in a million years.

UPDATE: The name of the Brazilian reporter is Pablo Lopez Guelli and this is one of his articles about Venezuela.

Also, he talks about his personal perceptions of Chavez in here.

The SNTP (National sindicate of press journalist) have reacted against Chavez attack to this reporter.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Freedom to agree

Feb 22nd 2007 | CARACAS
From The Economist print edition

Silencing dissenting views little by little

SINCE he took office in 1999 Hugo Chávez, Venezuela's leftist president, has steadily centralised power in his own hands. But his officials have always been able to counter accusations that he is an autocrat by pointing to a pugnacious and largely free opposition media. That argument looks increasingly threadbare.

Shortly after winning a presidential election in December with 63% of the vote, Mr Chávez announced that he would not renew the licence of one of the country's oldest broadcasters, Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV), when this expires on May 27th. The owner of RCTV, Marcel Granier, is an outspoken critic of Mr Chávez. The decision appeared to be “a form of censorship [and] a warning to others”, in the view of José Miguel Insulza, a Chilean Socialist who is secretary-general of the Organisation of American States. The opposition press faces increasing harassment. But government-owned media are multiplying.

The government accuses RCTV of breaking broadcasting laws, of discriminating against Mr Chávez's supporters and even of conspiring against the state. Yet it has made no effort to air its case in the courts. The broadcasting regulator, Conatel, has remained silent on the issue. Its director, Alvin Lezama, was sacked not long after the RCTV decision was announced, and the body merged into a new telecommunications ministry.

Tal Cual, an evening paper whose editor, Teodoro Petkoff, snipes at the government from the centre-left, was this month fined for a humorous editorial addressed to the president's nine year-old daughter, Rosinés. Mr Chávez frequently refers to her in public. He ordered that the country's coat-of-arms be changed after she said the white horse on it was “looking backwards”. Laureano Márquez, a humorist, suggested in Tal Cual that Rosinés might ask a few other favours: “that he not get so cross with those of us who don't think like him”, for instance. He and the paper were prosecuted for violating the child's “honour, reputation [and] private life”.

Venezuela's four privately owned national TV channels showed bias in their coverage of the country's bitter political conflict of 2001-04. They supported a coup attempt that briefly ousted the president in 2002, and notoriously failed to cover demonstrations calling for his return. Mr Chávez has frequently threatened them with drastic measures “even though they'll call me a tyrant”. His government has approved vaguely worded and potentially repressive media legislation, apparently to encourage self-censorship.

Two of the four took the hint. Venevisión, which is controlled by Gustavo Cisneros, a prominent Venezuelan businessman, and Televen (always the mildest) scrapped programmes run by opposition journalists and toned down their news coverage. These channels' licences may, it seems, be renewed. The fourth—Globovisión, a 24-hour news channel—is newer and its licence is not yet up for renewal. The result is that “as from June, Globovisión will be the only TV signal broadcast out of Caracas that is not pro-Chávez,” says Andrés Cañizales, a media critic. And Globovisión already complains of constant official harassment.

Meanwhile, the government has vastly expanded its own media holdings. It runs three national TV channels, as well as Telesur, an international news channel set up by Mr Chávez as an answer to CNN. It recently bought CMT, a small Caracas channel, to broadcast Telesur at home. It has pumped money and other resources into “alternative” and “community” media, most of which are dependent on the state and are unlikely to adopt a critical stance.

Mr Chávez this month relaunched his weekly “Hello President” programme as a 90-minute nightly radio show, with a TV version once a week. Promising “exclusives” in every edition, he used the first to announce a new decree against “hoarders and speculators” with six-year jail terms for offenders. He also regularly obliges all TV and radio stations to broadcast his rambling speeches live.

Programming on state media is heavily slanted in favour of the government. Dissident voices, even from within the chavista camp, are mostly excluded. A study by the Global Media Observatory, a Venezuelan NGO of leftist inspiration, found coverage of December's election by the main government channel, VTV, to be even less balanced than that of RCTV. On several occasions, the study noted, VTV even suspended its news programmes in order to carry live coverage of government events, “especially the inauguration of public works”.

Responsibility for regulating the media now lies with Jesse Chacón, the telecommunications minister. A former army officer, he took part in a bloody coup attempt against a democratic government in 1992. (Mr Chávez led another coup attempt in the same year.) He says that the government will use RCTV's slot for a “public service” channel. The opposition is sceptical, pointing out that it has failed to do this with any of its other channels. After May 27th, it will be up to the government to prove them wrong.

Kuddos to Craig Ferguson

This guy is hillarious, he made one of the funniest commentaries on Chavez when he went to speak at the UN. But on President Day's show, he actually draw a line and shown some dignity about not making fun of a sick person, who is the talk of the day. Comedians should keep messing up with the Hugo Chavez of the world and leave the Britneys and Anna Nicoles out. Yep.



Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Ignoring Chavez's Plan

Hat tip to Maria for sending this beautiful article that says it all, facts included too.

BY MICHAEL ROWAN AND DOUG SCHOEN
February 20, 2007

Hugo Chavez may have lost both the recall referendum in 2004 and the December 2006 presidential election, according to studies conducted by a distinguished multidisciplinary team in Caracas, Venezuela. The team includes the rector of Universidad Simon Bolivar, Frederick Malpica, and a former rector of the National Electoral Council, Alfredo Weil.

Astonishing as it may seem to Americans who believe the contention by Mr. Chavez that he won both elections by a landslide — 58% to 42% in the recall and 61% to 39% in the presidential election — the studies show that since 2003, Mr. Chavez has added 4.4 million favorable names to the voter list and "migrated" 2.6 million unfavorable voters to places where it was difficult or impossible for them to vote.

None of these additions or migrations to the voter-register has been independently audited in Venezuela. Instead, the votes have been electronically counted by Chavez cronies. So when Mr. Chavez announces a landslide, there has been no way to prove otherwise, even though exit polls and other data have consistently shown that half the voters of Venezuela or more oppose Mr. Chavez.

On the basis of this fraudulent manipulation, Mr. Chavez has claimed a national mandate for all of the following, which we clarify for Americans as if President Bush had done so in America. He:

• won all 435 seats in the House and all 100 in the Senate, and packed the Supreme Court with nine sycophants that never ruled against him;

• asked his rubber-stamp Congress to let him legislate unilaterally including amending the Constitution, and 100% of the members of Congress voted for that;

• decreed under these powers that he can run for re-election to the presidency for life;

• plans to decree that cities and states will no longer be governed by elected mayors and governors, but by people's committees named by him;

• owned or controlled all but a few TV and radio stations that either cover his endless speeches averaging 40 hours a week or risk losing their broadcast licenses;

• created one political party and denied the rights of citizenship to recalcitrant members of opposition parties;

• took over the Federal Reserve and spent the national Treasury as if it were a personal checking account;

• funded his campaign with government money and publicly and repeatedly threatened government workers to vote for him or be fired;

• dictated wages, prices, interest rates, profits, and currency exchange rates under the economic theory that he knows best;

• created an army reserve commanded personally by him that was 10 times the size of the existing military;

• nationalized the telephone and electric utilities along with thousands of private enterprises on the theory that collectives are better than private enterprises;

• put military henchmen loyal only to him in charge of government and civil institutions that they have no qualifications to run;

• declared that schools would submit to a curriculum that rewrites national history as he sees it, and mandated military indoctrination for all children;

• dictated the purpose and occupancy for private homes, apartment houses, and properties under the threat of confiscation if owners did not comply;

• prosecuted human rights and voter-rights leaders for treason, which is punishable by 16 years in prison;

• jailed individuals for five years who voiced opinions on TV he disagreed with;

• looked the other way as thousands of his police and military worked the murder, kidnapping, theft, drug, and money-laundering trades with impunity;

• began considering declaring a national religion with him as its spiritual leader;

• changed the way unemployment and poverty are calculated when the international standards of measurement proved embarrassing to his false claims of having solved those problems;

• ran an off-budget slush fund that rivals the size of the official government budget;

• increased the size of a corrupt and inefficient bureaucracy so grandly that he now has at least one employee in half the families of the country;

• traveled the world lavishly preaching about ending poverty, welfare, and theft — the three main characteristics of his government;

• advertised his model of government — with the highest inflation rate and highest murder rate in Latin America, and one of the worst human rights records — as the hope of the world.

We are not making this up. Mr. Chavez did — or is doing — all of that and more. But some have said that he is really a good guy who has been slandered and misunderstood. We need more dialogue with him, they say. He's an elected president of a sovereign nation and we should respect that, they also say.

What is it about Mr. Chavez that they don't get? What does Mr. Chavez have to do to make them see him as he really is? If calling Mr. Bush "the Devil" and America "the Evil Empire" is all someone has to do to gain acceptance from those who oppose American policy, why didn't Pol Pot, Muammar Gadhafi, and Robert Mugabe qualify?

President Carter endorsed the Chavez counts without any verifiable paper ballot count or audit. Why? And why does he continue to support Mr. Chavez? Why do members of Congress from 17 states look the other way as Mr. Chavez delivers subsidized oil to households in their districts?

We believe Mr. Chavez is given a wide berth everywhere because he's got an oil supply second only to Saudi Arabia. He is using America's oil market — or lack of oil production — to get Americans to ignore what he's up to.

Mr. Schoen is a former principal in Penn Schoen & Berland, which conducted exit polls in the 2004 recall referendum and in the 2006 presidential election. Mr. Rowan is a free-lance columnist and the author of "Getting Over Chavez and Poverty."

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Chávez Threatens to Jail Price Control Violators

Latests news fom the People´s Republic of Hugoslavia...

Sigh... so now we have the superhero of the poor creating a crisis that can be easily corrected so he can build a committee where people can report on other people, right? Where have I seen that before... let me guess... uhmm.... looking for an excuse to expropriate Hugo? Can he be more obvious? What do you think is Hugo´s mantra? I am gonna help the poor, or... I am all about to seize control....?




By SIMON ROMERO
CARACAS, Venezuela, Feb. 16 — Faced with an accelerating inflation rate and shortages of basic foods like beef, chicken and milk, President Hugo Chávez has threatened to jail grocery store owners and nationalize their businesses if they violate the country’s expanding price controls.

Food producers and economists say the measures announced late Thursday night, which include removing three zeroes from the denomination of Venezuela’s currency, are likely to backfire and generate even more acute shortages and higher prices for consumers. Inflation climbed to an annual rate of 18.4 percent a year in January, the highest in Latin America and far above the official target of 10 to 12 percent.

Mr. Chávez, whose leftist populism remains highly popular among Venezuela’s poor and working classes, seemed unfazed by criticism of his policies. Appearing live on national television, he called for the creation of “committees of social control,” essentially groups of his political supporters whose purpose would be to report on farmers, ranchers, supermarket owners and street vendors who circumvent the state’s effort to control food prices.

“It is surreal that we’ve arrived at a point where we are in danger of squandering a major oil boom,” said José Guerra, a former chief of economic research at Venezuela’s central bank, who left Mr. Chavez’s government in 2004. “If the government insists on sticking to policies that are clearly failing, we may be headed down the road of Zimbabwe.”

For now, Venezuela remains far from any nightmarish economic meltdown. The country, which has the largest conventional oil reserves outside the Middle East, is still enjoying a revenue windfall from historically high oil prices, resulting in a surge in consumer spending and lavish government financing for an array of social welfare and infrastructure programs. Dollar reserves at the central bank total more than $35 billion.

The economy grew by more than 10 percent last year, helping Mr. Chávez glide to a re-election victory in December with 63 percent of the vote. Yet economists who have worked with Mr. Chávez’s government say that soaring public spending is overheating Venezuela’s economy, generating imbalances in the distribution of products from sugar to basic construction materials like wallboard.

Public spending grew last year by more than 50 percent and has more than doubled since the start of 2004, as Mr. Chávez has channeled oil revenues into social programs and projects like bridges, highways, trains, subways, museums and, in a departure for a country where baseball reigns supreme, soccer stadiums.

In an indicator of concern with Mr. Chávez’s economic policies, which included nationalizing companies in the telephone and electricity industries, foreign direct investment was negative in the first nine months of 2006. The last year Venezuela had a net investment outflow was in 1986.

Shortages of basic foods have been sporadic since the government strengthened price controls in 2003 after a debilitating strike by oil workers. But in recent weeks, the scarcity of items like meat and chicken has led to a panicked reaction by federal authorities as they try to understand how such shortages could develop in a seemingly flourishing economy.

Entering a supermarket here is a bizarre experience. Shelves are fully stocked with Scotch whiskey, Argentine wines and imported cheeses like brie and Camembert, but basic staples like black beans and desirable cuts of beef like sirloin are often absent. Customers, even those in the government’s own Mercal chain of subsidized grocery stores, are left with choices like pork neck bones, rabbit and unusual cuts of lamb.

With shoppers limited to just two large packages of sugar, a black market in sugar has developed among street vendors in parts of Caracas. “This country is going to turn into Cuba, or Chávez will have to give in,” said Cándida de Gómez, 54, a shopper at a private supermarket in Los Palos Grandes, a district in the capital.

José Vielma Mora, the chief of Seniat, the government’s tax agency, oversaw a raid this month on a warehouse here where officials seized about 165 tons of sugar. Mr. Vielma said the raid exposed hoarding by vendors who were unwilling to sell the sugar at official prices. He and other officials in Mr. Chávez’s government have repeatedly blamed the shortages on producers, intermediaries and grocers.

Those in the food industry argue that the price controls prevented them from making a profit after inflation rose and the value of Venezuela’s currency plunged in black market trading in recent weeks. The bolívar, the country’s currency, fell more than 30 percent to about 4,400 to the dollar in unofficial trading following Mr. Chávez’s nationalization of Venezuela’s main telephone company, CANTV, and its largest electric utility, Electricidad de Caracas.

Fears that more private companies could be nationalized have put further pressure on the currency as rich Venezuelans try to take money out of the country. Concern over capital flight has made the government jittery, with vague threats issued to newspapers that publish unofficial currency rates (officially the bolívar is quoted at about 2,150 to the dollar).

Regardless of efforts to stop illicit currency trading, the weaker bolívar has made imported food, fertilizers and agricultural equipment more expensive. Venezuela, despite boasting some of South America’s most fertile farmland, still imports more than half its food, largely from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and the United States.

Supermarket owners expressed relief when the government this week cut value-added taxes on retail food sales and raised the prices on more than 100 staples in an effort to alleviate the shortages. The announcement included an average 32 percent increase in beef prices and a 45 percent increase in chicken prices.

Following Mr. Chávez’s nationalization threat, supermarket owners were cautious in their public statements. “As long as we are complying with the regulations, I don’t believe there will be any type of reprisal,” said Luis Rodríguez, executive director of the National Supermarket Association.

But many were clearly torn, afraid that their stores could be seized if they complained, but at a loss as to how to continue operating. “If I don’t sell at the regulated price they’ll fine me, and if I don’t sell meat I’ll be out of business,” said a butcher shop owner here.

During his television broadcast, Mr. Chávez said his measures would be laid out in a decree, a power that his rubber-stamp legislature just bestowed upon him. He acknowledged that removing taxes on food sales would deprive the government of more than $3 billion in revenues, higher than the military budget, but he said tax increases on luxuries like beach homes and yachts would make up for part of the shortfall.

Mr. Chávez also said he would raise subsidies for state-owned grocery stores. Economists say such subsidies, together with hefty loans to farmers, have allowed the price controls to function relatively well until recent weeks.

But recent expropriations of farms and ranches, part of Mr. Chávez’s effort to empower state-financed cooperatives, have also weighed on domestic food production as the new managers retool operations. So has the flood of petrodollars into the economy, easing food imports and making some domestic producers uncompetitive, an affliction common to oil economies.

“There seems to be a basic misunderstanding in Chávez’s government of what is driving scarcity and inflation,” said Francisco Rodríguez, a former chief economist at Venezuela’s National Assembly who teaches at Wesleyan University.

“There are competent people in the government who know that Chávez needs to lower spending if he wants to defeat these problems,” Mr. Rodríguez said. “But there are few people in positions of power who are willing to risk telling him what he needs to hear.”

Daniel Cancel contributed reporting.

Friday, February 16, 2007

The wonderful world of XXI century socialism...



Exactly! It doesn't make any sense!

Living on a society with no game means people can't lose, but can't win either... and if we take the example of Eastern Europe and Cuba, well, seems you can't lose because there's anything left you actually could lose...

Thursday, February 15, 2007

The silly geisha Cilia...

The only institutionalized thing in Latin America is caos and lack of respect to the rule of law...
-Jaime Bayly



For the ones who cannot understand, around min 2, Bayly is making fun of this woman, Cilia, Cilia Flores, called "Silly Flowers" by many, who happens to be the "President" of the Venezuelan Congress and concubine of the Foreign Minister (who happens to be a bus driver turned Foreign Minister only because Chavez said so); she is calling the congress in the video to go to the street to proclaim their Chavez´s rule by decree law passing (that rule was passed about two weeks ago). In other words, they really are not mediocre and not academically or mentally fit for their positions in the congress, but they are giving away any little power they had. I assure you that I pay more attention to my decorative plants which I have at home than Chavez to this mentally subnormal congress.

How disgustingly low and decadent. I think Rome saw better days under Nero than Venezuela under Chavez.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

And the alcoholic of the month is...

Doug Thorburn thinks Hugo Chavez shows a lot of behaviour of that an alcoholic. What do you think? Do you think Hugo Chavez likes to drink heavily or he is into other type of drugs? Or he is clean but plain crazy?

Hugo Chavez, Totalitarian Alcoholic

by Doug Thorburn from addictionreport.com

The story of Hugo Chavez’ consolidation of power over his Venezuelan subjects will likely be viewed by future historians as one of the shrewdest Machiavellian power-grabs ever. The methodical, gradual—yet inexorable increase in control during his seven-year reign has been masterfully designed to avoid inciting social upheaval. Unfortunately for Venezuelans as well for people in neighboring countries, his brand of totalitarianism is likely to get much worse.

In myth # 66 of Alcoholism Myths and Realities, I mentioned that the United States initially dismissed Chavez because it was widely believed that “He’s probably just a harmless ‘big talker.’” I wrote, “We dismiss such talk, in which the rich or some other class is blamed for society’s problems, at great risk. If policy makers in Washington had understood alcoholism, they might not have underestimated Chavez.” I suggested that although we lacked definitive proof, alcohol or other-drug addiction was the best explanation for his extraordinary power-seeking behaviors. In addition, blaming the most successful economic system and nation ever for the poverty of his people is by itself an excellent clue to manipulation or confabulated thinking rooted in alcoholism. The trouble is, as those with at least ten years’ sobriety readily admit, when using addicts are capable of anything, including disrupting the lives of others in unimaginable ways.

Most observers concerned with an “alcohol problem” look for obvious late-stage signs of addiction such as loss of control over use or appearing drunk in public. Early-stage alcoholics, particularly those in positions of power, are often far too smart to ever look the part. Instead, they give away the secret by their behaviors, especially in the capricious exercise of power. They may exhibit a “rules don’t apply to me” attitude, act in compulsive, dogmatic and arrogant ways, use twisted logic, masterfully lie, disparage others and intimidate to get their way. Chavez displays all of these symptoms and more. He is described as having an “utter lack of inhibitions,” an “obsessive need to cast himself as hero of the people,” unpredictable, bombastic, arbitrary, bizarre and unreliable. Alcoholics in positions of power are nothing if not mercurial and cunning. The National Assembly, stuffed with his disciples, has now granted him the power to rule by decree. This marks the beginning of what is likely to be a far more obvious tyranny.

This concentration of power has been accomplished by systematically weakening competing branches of government. The legislative branch was trimmed from a bicameral body to a more easily controlled single chamber. He has packed the courts with cronies. The December 2006 election proved that he controls the reported vote, having received 61% “support” among 16 million voters in a nation of 27 million with over 60% too young to even register. In the 27 months up to the December 2006 election, voter rolls grew 30%. No one has any idea who the new voters are. Chavez makes former President Richard Nixon look like a piker when it comes to an “enemies” list: a local woman told a Wall Street Journal reporter that although many greatly dislike Chavez, they believe electronic voting and fingerprint tracking machines at the polls allow the government to know how they vote, resulting in a subsequent loss of employment if they vote incorrectly. What else can they do when the government is the only employer?

In a world that hasn’t yet learned that people are far safer from demagogues and tyrants when resources are privately owned, Chavez and others of his ilk are enabled. In private lives as well as public ones, money is the biggest enabler. His opponents told National Geographic writer Alma Guillermoprieto that Chavez has so many enemies, if it weren’t for his control of the oil company, PDVSA, and the funds it provides with which to bribe voters and foreigners alike, he would not be able to remain in power. Oil money has allowed Chavez to survive mistakes such as running the oil infrastructure into the ground, which would have otherwise destroyed his power-base. Socialism and its all-too-common by-product, corruption, have already resulted in a GDP collapse from $120 billion at the close of 2000 to an estimated $71 billion in 2003; more recent numbers probably aren’t reliable and oil revenues may hide massive economic deterioration. In a move reminiscent of Stalin’s 1937 purge of over half of his army and 80% of his most capable top brass, Chavez sacked two-thirds of managers and technical oil-field staff in 2002, along with what the Economist Magazine called their “irreplaceable understanding of the idiosyncrasies of its wells and fields.” Staffing promptly became more political: Chavez’ brother and cousin suddenly rose to the top ranks at PDVSA. Former employees who signed a petition advocating the recall of Chavez in 2002 have been blacklisted from jobs at both the government oil company and its contractors. Along with other petitioners, their names and national identification numbers were plastered on the web site of a pro-Chavez congressman and they were subsequently denied passports, government contracts and public welfare. The capricious power-seeking behaviors of an alcoholic are all-too-evident.

In the meantime, oil money has been used to fund propaganda and buy friends. Anti-American billboards litter the roads of Caracas and Venezuelan crude is sold at pennies on the dollar to other South American countries in a blatant bid to encourage their support (as well as over-consumption). In a cult of personality reminiscent of that of North Korea’s alcoholic Kim Jong Il, a 30-foot high close-up of his face and hands looms behind his podium at official ceremonies. As his opposition is squelched, cult-like manifestations of alcoholism can be expected to dramatically increase. The silence should soon become deafening. The innocuously titled “Law of Social Responsibility in Radio and Television,” passed in 2004, allows the government to suspend the licenses of stations that “promote, defend or incite breaches of public order or that are contrary to the security of the nation.” This will be used against the major opposition media, RCTV, as an excuse to non-renew the licenses of its 40 radio and TV stations. Even if he were to renew them, how much advertising will opposition stations sell when industry is nationalized and the few remaining private companies are afraid to air ads on stations that disagree with government policies? Alcoholics do everything they are in a position to do to bend rules for themselves and dictate rules to everyone else.

Chavez was elected on an “anti-corruption” platform. Yet corruption has gotten so bad that Transparency International, a Berlin-based watchdog, placed Venezuela 140th out of 163 countries in its annual survey of corruption, with a 2.3 rating out of a possible 10, on par with that of Niger’s and Zimbabwe’s. At his inauguration, he swore to overturn the 1961 constitution and create one that would facilitate “participatory democracy.” Apparently, his view of such democracy requires that all decisions be concentrated in his hands, from his own party’s lists of candidates for other offices to increasing murkiness of PDVSA’s finances, which stopped issuing reports in 2003. It has since transferred much of its earnings to a Chavez-controlled development fund for which revenues and expenses are not revealed.

Hypocrisy, particularly in conjunction with increasing one’s power, is one of the great unheralded clues to alcoholism. Chavez is pushing through a law that will restrict the ability of non-governmental organizations to receive money from abroad. However, it’s okay for his government to send as much as an estimated $50 billion in foreign “aid” to private people and organizations over the last couple of years including subsidized heating oil for poor districts in the Northeastern U.S. This is especially loathsome when we consider that this probably accounts for at least 25% of Venezuela’s GDP and as many as 50% of his own people live in a state of far worse poverty than the worst off in the U.S. Anyone found guilty of “disrespecting” the President or “inciting panic”—offenses that could arguably include unflattering photographs or nasty political cartoons—faces up to five years in jail. Yet he is cozying up to Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, backs Iran’s nuclear program and, according to The Wall Street Journal, “embraces” Ahmadinejad’s hateful anti-Semitism, which rivals that of Adolf Hitler’s. He describes Condoleeza Rice as “illiterate” and has suggested that she suffers from sexual frustration. He calls George W. Bush “Mr. Danger,” “asshole,” and “the devil,” and in one extraordinary harangue filled with hyperbole (at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLf08O3D_f0), a “coward, assassin and genocist (sic)…you’re an alcoholic, a drunk…” Alcoholics often engage in hyperbole and sneeringly identify others as alcoholics. When the Secretary-General of the Organization of American States, Miguel Insulza, said that Chavez’ threat to close RCTV appears to be “censorship against freedom of expression,” Chavez called Insulza to resign, saying he was an “idiot” who was acting like a “viceroy of the empire” (i.e., the United States). Recovering alcoholics have a saying describing themselves when using: one finger out, three fingers back.

His twisted logic is breathtaking in imagination. In threatening to confiscate ranches, he explained, “If someone doesn’t want [to reach an agreement with us], he can go to the courts, but we’re going to ask you for all the [documents] from 1821, and if [the property] wasn’t registered in 1821…” at which point he made the sound of a piece of paper being torn in half. The trouble is Venezuelan authorities didn’t get around to issuing titles until decades later. His childish antics would be amusing if they weren’t so intimidating: while making verbal threats not to renew the RCTV licenses, Chavez said, “RCTV has only a few days left…they can scream, stomp their feet, do whatever they want, but the license is finished. They can say whatever they want, I don’t care, it’s over.”

In a report at http://www.vcrisis.com/index.php?content=letters/200502211639, Chavez is described as paranoid and fears assassination plots. While paranoia is a common symptom of cocaine and amphetamine addiction, Chavez appears too bloated to be addicted to anything other than alcohol and, perhaps, pharmaceuticals such as barbiturates to offset his copious caffeine intake (Chavez is reported to drink as many as 30 demitasses of coffee a day and could be replicating Hitler’s caffeine/barbiturate use). On the other hand, the site recalls a Cuban defector who in 2002 said that Castro’s men consider Chavez and many of his inner circle to be “drug addicts.” A private correspondent, who has long suspected Chavez is on something, points out that his pupil size and puffy face vary considerably and early in his career a complacent shrink medicated both him and his wife. Another correspondent says he uses his wife as a punching bag. One of the lesser-known indications of alcoholism is what Lucy Barry Robe in Co-Starring Famous Women and Alcohol called “telephonitis,” or “drunk dialing.” Chavez is known for calling friends late at night, with no particular agenda.

The signs and symptoms of alcoholism should be taken seriously by everyone who is at risk of being affected by his megalomania. With the purchase of 100,000 AK-47s, at least 40 Mi-35 assault helicopters and several fighter jets for his almost 1 million man reserve army, by far the largest in South America and far larger as a percent of population than that of the U.S., he has shown that his version of “democracy” requires a war machine with manufactured enemies. And because alcoholics are capable of anything—and I do mean “anything”—we are all at risk.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

How much people love Chavez...



The Lt. Coronel who thinks is a King cannot be disturbed while he speechs.

Note for the Chavistas who complain about people call him Lt. Coronel: Whenever he uses his uniform, he is a Lt. Coronel, therefore that's how he should be called.

Monday, February 05, 2007

A day on Caracas's Carnivals...

The way Caraqueños spent Carnivals on the time of the military dictatorship of "Mi General", who is not the same person that "Micomandante", not in a million years ... On those days, we were all Venezuelans, it seems that times have changed now...



My parents meet on a Carnival dance... my mom was part of a comparsa de "negritas", she had a mask on and my dad felt in love with her eyes... the rest is history... he he...