Tuesday, July 31, 2007

No comments...



Well job guys!

Should read, "Inscripciones abiertas". Funny thing is that the "Mision Ribas is the one in charge to put kids in school or something like that. I am not really sure what is it that they do. This could be a joke though... but again, with Chavismo, you never know.

Jose Felix Ribas must be revolving on his grave.

hat/tip to Maria for this picture.

Venezuelans have a positive view of America, after all.



Isn´t this graph something else? The story is not about Venezuelans, it´s about Germans and their negative impression of United States of America. BUT LOOK, tell me where is Venezuela in the graph.

What this means is, that in despite of the gazillion dollars that Chavez is putting into anti American propaganda inside Venezuela, IT IS NOT WORKING (and those dollars can be put in hospitals an other more important things, btw). So, 56% of Venezuelans have, indeed a positive view of the good´ol United States of America.

Thanks Lee for graph.

Monday, July 30, 2007

A present for EGO Chavez in his birthday

Happy delayed Birthday Hugo! I didn't have time to congratulate you on Saturday since I have more important things to do than to say Happy Birthday to a psychopath like you who is destroying my country.

In any case, your present is this translation of an article that is all over the internet in Spanish. It's sort of a personality chart, for you to keep, not made by an astrologer but by a Venezuelan psychiatrist. I haven't found the original source where this article was published, but it appear to be credible enough (that in fact was written by Dr. Pomenta) since it appeared in the blog of Iñaki Anasagasti, representative of the Bizkaia Congress of the Basque Country. Anasagasti was born and raised in Venezuela, son of Basque immigrants.

Are we surprised, really, than the majority of Hugo Chavez's unsavory and lame followers, from Juan Barreto, mayor of the metropolitan area of Caracas, to obscure internet bully posters, trolls like "Slave Revolt" or the Brisbane group of terrorists, have also all kinds of personality behavior disorders? Talk about the meeting of the mentally disturbed minds! He dicho.

After reading this profile, you want to think about what's really happening in Venezuela. How come they are allowing this guy to get away with this?

Psychological profile of PRESIDENTE HUGO CHÁVEZ FRIAS.

By Dr. Prof. Eloy Silvio Pomenta
Psychiatrist, personality behavior studies.

"As a psychiatrist specialized in personality behavior and author of several books on borderline and narcissistic personalities, I am widely qualified to make a psychological profile of president Hugo Chavez.

On the basis of its public and well-known behavior, it is possible to locate his personality on the lowest level of the primitive personality types, called them “primitives” since these types of personalities operate on a very primary level and structures into a very disorganized pattern. More specifically, his personality fit within the Narcissist personality behavior, whose more important characteristics are:

1. Grandiosity: An abnormally hypertrophic (overgrown) ego, an absolutely inflated self-concept of itself and strong egocentric tendencies. (For example: they believe they are the most beautiful, intelligent, predestined, messianic, seductive people).


2. Exhibitionism: Necessity of constant attention and admiration. The tendency of the subject to be ostentatious with their physical appearance, their intellectual aptitude or any other peculiarities of their personalities.


3. Omnipotence: Try to establish goals and projects that overwhelm their real capacities and the real possibilities that the environment offers. (For example to be believed the leader of a supposed Latin American, or worldwide revolution).


4. Fragile self-esteem: the inflated ego determines the need of insatiable narcissistic provisions. A “stimuli hunger” and an “addiction” to tributes and allowances settle down. While abundant allowances and tributes flow, the self-esteem is excited. As soon as any frustration happens, sometimes by an insignificant detail, the personality sinks. These fiascos have been calls pseudo-depressions, since they do not involve nostalgia or loss of love like in true depressions. And they hardly last for hours or a few days, the self-esteem recovers as soon as a new stimulus happens.


5. Incapacity to love: Since the entire affective load is concentrated in their own ego, there is no affective availability left to others. In spite of the touching and seductive exuberances that usually unfold the narcissists to captivate other people, they are not able to genuinely love, but they use them for the profit of its intentions or self needs. The narcissists lack scruples and one could say, “They walk on corpses”.


6. Reality judgment: Since they are not being able to see beyond their own ego, they tend to fake and to deny obvious aspects of the reality that do not agree or favor their intentions. For that reason the narcissists usually fail in their projects, because they only see what it agrees to them. They project the fault on the others when something does not come out well.

7. Narcissist rage: The frustrations, the critic in their surroundings and the disgusting aspects of reality, can cause such reactions called of “narcissist rage”, because of the violent and disproportioned response. These rages can blind the conscience and sometimes can create transitory psychotic reactions with paranoid characteristics.


8. Envy: This is the unconscious predominant affection of the narcissist personality. Outside their huge ego, it cannot have anything valuable. They are highly destructive personas. All good and valuable must be destroyed by the narcissist, so that is anything left to envy.


In conclusion, the following can be added: when the narcissist is a common person, the damages do not go beyond itself or of its surroundings. But when a Chief of State of an important oil country is a narcissist, with unlimited resources to seduce and manipulate the masses, a leader who manages to surround himself by pernicious and destructive collaborators, who are able to conquer intellectual followers that propagate his message and other political and economic Chiefs of State or groups who take advantage of their pseudo-ideology with lucrative aims, then the repercussions can get to a catastrophic national and even international level".


This translated article is of Dr Eloy Silvio Pomenta. Dr. Pomenta is professor of the Chair of Psychiatry of the Vargas School of Medicine (Central University of Venezuela) and postgraduate professor of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy of the Psychiatry's faculty. Also, he was President of the Venezuelan Society of Psychiatry (1969).

Some published books of Dr. Pomenta: Research work about “the Mental Health of the Teacher in Venezuela in “The Teacher and the Education in the Venezuelan Society” (1965); Marcuse, Psychiatry and Liberation (1970); The Borderline or the narcissist way to live (1985); The narcissism and the aim of century XX (1989); "Upheaval of Borderline Personality" (2005).

Friday, July 27, 2007

Outstanding Venezuelan bloggers

Recognized on Gustavo Coronel's latest post.

"(...) A new political and intellectual leadership is emerging and is today in the forefront of the fight against the Chavez dictatorship. Some of the members of the new democratic leadership are not politicians in the traditional sense. They do not control political organizations. Many write and mold public opinion. They are widely read and mostly trusted by the Venezuelan public because they are saying and doing much of what the people would like to say and do. In appreciation of their efforts I have made a personal ranking of these new leaders. Readers can add their own candidates or react positively or negatively to my choices. I am aware that there are very worthy democratic Venezuelans who are not in this list and that readers might disagree about some of my choices but this is one way to start identifying the influential, democratic leadership in the country."

The Ranking

(...)

26. Miguél Octavio. Editor of one of the best Venezuelan blogs in English, “The Devil’s Excrement”;
27. Daniel Duquenal, Editor of one of the best Venezuelan blogs in English, “Venezuelan News and Views”;


~~ Congratulations!!! ~~~

But, but, but... who made this scale model who is incorrect?

"But, who made this scale model who is incorrect? A Venezuelan?"
- Germán Saltrón

That was one of the "defense" words of this Venezuelan foreign ministry official who deals with international human rights groups, in reference to the acts of April, 11. His words were implying that behind the opposition, the hand of a foreigner who doesn't know Caracas made this model.

"Turned away by Venezuelan courts, Romero and two other lawyers brought their case before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, a branch of the Organization of American States.

The IACHR will decide whether the Chávez government has purposefully dragged its feet on the case, as Romero argues, or, as government lawyers contend, is simply stymied by the complexities of investigating the chaotic events of April 12, 2002.

...

Romero told The Miami Herald after the IACHR hearing that he built the model in 2003 for a Venezuelan Supreme Court hearing that never took place.

...

"State Department resources were the motors of this plan," said Germán Saltrón, a Venezuelan foreign ministry official who deals with international human rights bodies. Washington has repeatedly denied those claims.

...

Saltrón also criticized the IACHR, reiterating accusations -- repeatedly denied by the OAS -- that the IACHR had backed the coup through statements issued at the time."

Read the whole story here.

In Spanish:

"Saltrón acusó a Romero e Himiob de llevar una maqueta “incorrecta, aparentemente hecha por extranjeros” (de nuevo la xenofobia) ya que la posición del Palacio Blanco en la maqueta “era incorrecta”. Romero le explicó por que era correcta y Saltrón quedó, de nuevo, regañado ante la audiencia. El miembro de la Comisión Clare Roberts comentó que “cinco años parecía ser un tiempo excesivo para conducir una investigación que ni siquiera habia comenzado”.



DUH!!!

A Friday post only for spanish readers...

This is genius. It was supposed to be a comedy, but it's more tragic-comedy. Sorry, I don't have an English translation of it. Enjoy.

~El cuento de la hormiga y la cigarra~

Versión clásica:
la hormiga trabaja a brazo partido todo el verano bajo un calor aplastante. Construye su casa y se aprovisiona de víveres para el invierno. La cigarra piensa que la hormiga es tonta y se pasa el verano riendo, bailando y jugando. Cuando llega el invierno, la hormiga se refugia en su casita donde tiene todo lo que le hace falta hasta la primavera. La cigarra tiritando, sin comida y sin cobijo, muere de frío.

~Fin~


Versión bolivariana: la hormiga trabaja a brazo partido todo el verano bajo un calor aplastante. Construye su casa y se aprovisiona de víveres para el invierno. La cigarra piensa que la hormiga es tonta y se pasa el verano riendo, bailando y jugando. Cuando llega el invierno, la hormiga se refugia en su casita donde tiene todo lo que le hace falta hasta la primavera.

La cigarra, tiritando, acude a la defensoría del pueblo exigiendo saber por qué la hormiga tiene derecho a vivienda y comida, mientras otros, con menos suerte que ella, pasan frío y hambre. El Defensor del Pueblo denuncia una conspiración imperialista tildando a la hormiga de agente de la C.I.A. Mario Silva muestra un video en el que la cigarra sale pasando frío y calamidades y a la vez muestra extractos del video, retransmitido por Desirée Santos Amaral desde la AN, en el que se ha espiado a la hormiga en su casa, bien calentita y con la mesa llena de comida.

El LÍDER SUPREMO, sale en Aló Presidente sorprendiéndose de que en un país tan moderno como el suyo, dejen sufrir a la pobre cigarra mientras que otros viven en la abundancia. Acusa a los medios de instigar al enriquecimiento ilícito, amenaza con revocar todas las concesiones privadas y pide a PDVSA que financie de inmediato la MISIÓN CHICHARRA DEL BARRIO, con Jorge Rodríguez a la cabeza de la Comisión. Hordas chavistas se instalan delante de la casa de la hormiga y rayan las paredes con cuanta consigna se les ocurre. VEA organiza una serie de artículos en los que cuestiona cómo la hormiga se ha enriquecido a espaldas de la cigarra e insta al gobierno a que aumente los impuestos de la hormiga de forma que las cigarras puedan vivir mejor.

Chávez le pide a Vielma Mora que presente de inmediato una propuesta de Impuesto al Lujo para las hormigas oligarcas, basándose en leyes sobre la igualdad económica, matrimonio homosexual entre cigarras y antidiscriminación, todas de carácter retroactivo, aprobadas en tiempo récord. El Seniat pecha a la hormiga con nuevos impuestos; además le impone una multa porque no contrató a la cigarra como ayudante en verano.

Las autoridades embargan la casa de la hormiga, pues ésta no tiene suficiente dinero para pagar la multa y los impuestos. La hormiga maltratada, perseguida, pero no derrotada, se va de Venezuela y se instala con éxito en Canadá. Hace un reportaje donde sale la cigarra con sobrepeso, ya que se ha comido casi todo lo que había mucho antes de que llegue la primavera.

La antigua casa de la hormiga se convierte en albergue social para cigarras y se deteriora al no hacer sus inquilinos nada para mantenerla en buen estado. Se dice que es una estrategia golpista de la oposición al impedir, con sus malos pensamientos, que el gobierno ponga los medios necesarios. Una comisión de investigación que costará 10 Millardos Fuertes se pone en marcha. Entretanto la cigarra muere de una sobredosis. Nicolás Maduro, Cilia Flores, Jorge Rodríguez e Isaías Rodríguez denuncian intento de magnicidio y critican el intervencionismo imperialista que ha impedido intentar corregir el problema de las desigualdades sociales.

La casa es ocupada por una banda de arañas bolivianas. El gobierno se felicita por la integración latinoamericana en Venezuela y organiza, para ello, un acto de tres días en el Teresa Carreño.

~Fin~


(H/tip to Correfoc).

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

If Patton were alive...

General George S. Patton jr would address this speech to you today, I love it:



Via Political Vindication

Venezuelan Foreign Ministry complains about Japanese ambassador

Japanese Ambassador to Venezuela Yasuo Matsui:

"We, Japanese, are more socialist that Chávez. The key is not whether a government is capitalist or socialist, but the way to organize people in order to be more cost-effective and overcome poverty. Therefore, we would like to see how the president faces a mixed economy,"

The question is, why the defiance attitude of Chavismo towards this comment? Are they afraid of something? I see it as a perfectly clear, articulate, smart commentary on why he thinks the Japanese are socialists. Not that long ago, one of the clowns of Chavez's entourage in the government said something like that we, Venezuelans, need to talk more and more about socialism, and that we have to be not afraid of this world. So, what's the problem with ambassador Matsui talking about socialism then? Can Venezuelans talk or not talk about socialism, Mr. "Presidente"?

Could be that the only ones who actually can talk about socialism are the Chavistas? Are they gonna prove ambassador Masui that his comments are wrong? That Japanese are not cost-effective people?



According to our shining star on Foreign affair, Nicolas Maduro, (bus driver by trade, happened to win the lottery becoming a Chavist and named into this position only because he is loyal to Chavez), any foreigner won't be able to talk about internal affairs by a new Real cédula (Royal decree) from the brilliant minds of the Chavismo. But Chavez indeed have the big mouth to talk about Bush in Harlen, about Garcia in Perú, about anything under the sun whenever he goes, to kiss the Queen of England on her cheek, etc etc... and the world laughs about it. How cute.

Descifrado.com says this morning that the first expulsion order of a foreigner is ready to be signed today. And the lucky winner is the Mexican Manuel Espino, leader of the PAN party, who happened to be in Caracas invited by Copei Party (of Venezuela) to talk in a forum about democracy. What irritated the government was Mr. Espino's comments about the constitutional reform that Chavez has under the sleeve.

Taiwan is also under the scrutiny of the regime, Chavismo has decided not to renew the visas of some of their diplomats, probably under China's preassure.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Single Venezuelan party planned. By James Ingham, professional idiot and totalitarian apologist

I got this very perceptive view of this article from a forum I like to read. I think the writer is absolutely right on the money with his comments.

Just read his analysis. Enjoy.

"Single Venezuelan party planned
By James Ingham, professional idiot and totalitarian apologist
BBC News, Caracas

Propaganda: Plans to form a single political party in Venezuela have taken a step forward with the first activists' meetings.

Reality: Plans to destroy all other political parties have begun by assembling groups of thugs to continue the systematic intimidation and violence that has been perpetuated against opposition parties for the last few years.

Propaganda: Six million people have signed up to become members of the President's United Socialist Party.

Reality: 100% of the people of Iraq also voted for Saddam Hussein.

Propaganda: Critics worry about the threat to plurality, but organisers say it will give ordinary Venezuelans more chance to shape the future of the country.

Reality: The BBC will print anything a socialist dictator's propaganda ministry will tell them to, and only an idiot journalist could repeat the notion that less freedom, and less political discourse could help the ordinary people.

Propaganda: Venezuela's parliament, the National Assembly, is made up purely of politicians who support the president.

Reality: Imagine that, a socialist dictator creating a politburo that follows his every whim. If this writer was even barely competent he would mention that this is reminiscent of Stalin.

Activist battalions

Propaganda: Hugo Chavez is changing that by creating one united party, which he says will be constructed from the bottom up.

Reality: Hugo Chavez, like other totalitarians is establishing a cult of personality centered around him, rather than a political body.

Propaganda: Six million people have volunteered to become activists.

Reality: This is the second time he's printed this number, as if it actually means anything.

Propaganda: They have been formed into battalions. More than 1,000 of these have now met for the first time.

Reality: Like the S.A. of Hitler and the Black Shirts of Mussolini, Chavez is assembling groups of civilian vigilantes and thugs to enforce his will.

Propaganda: They will choose representatives who will soon take part in a national congress which will decide how the party will work.

Reality: They will form a government based on the Soviet system.

Propaganda: However, all this is creating division within the coalition.

Reality: Amazingly, some people aren't willing to surrender their voice to a chubby, megalomaniacal, Castro-wannabe.

Propaganda: Three key parties have so far refused to dissolve their groups and they have expressed concerns that this new style of politics could lead to one way of thinking.

Reality: They're afraid that this will lead to fucking civil war, and mass-murder, which is what happens when socialists get in charge.

Propaganda: But Mr Chavez says the battalions will be centres of debate which will drive the socialist revolution.

Reality: The BBC should be fucking ashamed of itself for hiring this asshole."

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Shall I change my comparison of Hugo Chavez with Tony Montana instead of Tony Soprano?

I haven´t had time to post this news, that is not news anymore, but in any case I want to record what it´s the role that Chavista Venezuela is playing into drug smuggling all over the planet.

Let´s see, so not only Chavistas are disgusting beings who love to insult and attack anybody who dissent their ways, who are into destroying Venezuela´s state oil company, who are into some kind of dangerous relationship with the Islamofacist wing of Islam, but also they are very much into drug smuggling...

"International anti-drug specialists say corruption inside Venezuela's security forces(*) has turned the country into a major route for smugglers moving cocaine from neighbouring Colombia, the world's top producer, to the European and U.S. markets.

Interior Minister Pedro Carreno said the United States uses anti-drug cooperation deals to gain military footholds in Latin America, and that Venezuela refused to be caught in that trap. "They establish a treaty to cooperate financially so that they can later impose military bases."

The U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime says Venezuela was the most frequently cited transit country for shipments to Europe in 2005. Italy traced 41 percent of its cocaine back to Venezuela, up from 22 percent in 2004."


But, who is Pedro Carreño? For those who doesn't know, this brilliant shining star of the Chavismo, who happens to be the current Minister of Interior and Justice (!), was dishonorable discharged out the military when he was a Captain for stealing. Secondly, he was the one who sweared that Montesinos was dead in Perú (and not hiding in Venezuela) and also said that the CIA spy people towards DIRECT TV from your living room TV (that is, when you see TV they CIA are watching you from inside the TV! Yes!! He said that!)

You don't believe me, don't ya?



The Dallas News (hat/tip Lee) reports it this way:

"They say high-level corruption has also helped make Venezuela a major haven for drug smugglers running from the law.

The cocaine passing through Venezuela on President Hugo Chávez's watch has risen by as much as 30 tons a year since 2002, reaching an estimated 300 tons in 2006, according to outgoing U.S. Ambassador William Brownfield. That's roughly a third of the world's supply.

"Caracas is replacing Bogotá [Colombia's capital] as a center of everything related to drug operations," said Mildred Camero, who was Venezuela's top anti-drug official until she reported high-level corruption and was dismissed in 2005."


Shall I change my comparisson of Hugo Chavez with Tony Montana instead of Tony Soprano? Yeah, that's more like it.

But why the need of a very rich oil country to get into the drug business? Does Venezuela really need that much money? YES, all those under the table comissions Chavez has to pay, and how about funding his Islamofascist friends?.

(*) None other than the military who has become the ruling class, the boliburguesia. Yuck!

Caracastan

This news has some 30´ish Europe look that is not funny at all.


Via Jungle Mom.

"Our dear intellectual mullah, Seyed Mohammad Khatami, a well read man, who enjoys to rub shoulders with western academia, who likes to quote great men, and once called the Islamic revolution "the greatest plebiscite in history" has decided to buy hundreds of hectares of land in Venezuela just outside of Caracas. Now, why would a Shiite clergyman from Iran be interested in purchasing land in that tropical paradise?"

And, via Correfoc, an article by JAIME DAREMBLUM from the NY Sun.

{Caracas, along with Damascus and Beirut, openly host terrorist organizations from the Middle East. With the express approval of Mr. Chavez, the radical Lebanese of Hezbollah and the Palestinians of Hamas have opened offices in the Venezuelan capital, raising legitimate fears that some of the weapons amassed by Venezuela might end up in the hands of radical groups in Latin America.

For years now members of Hezbollah and Hamas, amongst others, have used the Tri-Border Area of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay for fundraising and recruitment. Indeed, Islamist radical group supporters from the TBA, Margarita Island in Venezuela, and other nations of the Caribbean Basin have funneled hundreds of millions of dollars back to their parent organizations in the Middle East, consequently extending the global support structure of international terrorism to the region. The recently foiled plot to bomb John F. Kennedy airport in New York, for example, was hatched in Trinidad and Tobago. No surprise then that diplomats and foreign observers have dubbed the Venezuelan capital "Caracastan."}

Friday, July 20, 2007

Man on the Moon



38 years ago mankind stepped foot on the moon.

Today, we have a gochita ("gochos" are people coming from Mérida, Venezuela), among other Venezuelans like Gregorio Drayer, working in NASA.

Who said that gochos were dumb? (long story!)

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Separated at birth?



From left to right, Iris Varela, one of the girfriends of this revolution and Linda Blair impersonating a possesed one in The Exorcist, just like Varela.

OK, this is a Friday post. It's suppose to be fun. Relax Chavistas! If Juan Barreto have a problem with people making fun of him and calling his mama, then he should consider to step down of public office. Ha! In any case, yesterday, while reading the comment section at Daniel´s blog, it occurred to me that those disgusting characters of the Chavismo belong in a novel from another parallel universe and somehow, like a bad joke, they ended in Venezuela as politicians... ruining our life and our Treasury.

So far, the winner of comparisons HAS to be Juan Barreto, that unsavory despicable being that happens to be the Mayor of the metropolitan area of Caracas. I compare him to Jabba The Hut from Star Wars, just for the looks and the natural yuck feeling that it gives to your stomach every time you see one or the other´s picture. Correfoc found great comparisson with Baron Harkonnen from Dune, not only for the look but for the despicable manners.







From left to right, Juan Barreto, Hakonnen by ?, Hakkonen by Moebius, Hakkonen in Lynch's Dune, Jabba The Hut.

José Vicente Rangel, resembles very well in looks and attitude that of Chancellor Palpatine (Star Wars), he was (still is?) the evil mastermind planning the total takeover of Venezuela, just like in Star Wars, Palpatine did the same with the Republic. He also have that je ne sais quoi with Dracula.



Cilia Flores, or Silly Flowers, immortalized by Jaime Bayly like a new, evil version from Mexico´s Chavo del Ocho´s La Chilidrina, "La Chilindrina Maléfica". Bayly was into something very good with this.





What else can we compare Mario Silva:



But with this?

And my favorite, is Hugo Chavez with Tony Soprano. Do I need to say why? These two are not related by looks precisely.

Please contribute with your thoughts! Tell me what Chavista you are comparing to what character (movie, novel, tv sitcom, whatever) and why. Looks and behavior apply.

Some ideas:


From left to right, William Lara (the voice of the revolution), Desiree Santos Amaral (congresswoman, she resembles an angry middle school director, doesn't she?)


Isaias Rodriguez (the poet of the revolution), Nicolas Maduro (the bus driver of the revolution).


The psychiatrist Jorguito Rodriguez, ex Electoral Council President, current executive Vice-President (the FRAUD -not Freud- of the revolution)

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Chavez worrying about Bush but not paying attentions to national affairs...

How rare. So, what is Chavez doing these days?


Ahhhhhh until when to listen to this madness for the love of God?

Video URL here.

While Pharaoh Chavez is fighting alone his very personal and one-sided-only battle against George W. Bush, 9 years of Presidency and the situation of the penitentiaries in Venezuela is hell on earth.

Specially if you are poor, and a woman.

While the international crowd of Marxist and privileged people who could afford the hassle to go to the freaking Copa América, a group of most violent and dangerous prisoners from the Internado Judicial de Falcón, drunk by a party held in the afternoon, decided to invaded the female aisle, in the same building.

Some of the female prisoners were brutally raped. We don't know what else happened there. The guards (only 4) ran for their lives, the National Guard never entered to reestablish the order, the prisoners entered the recint in the afternoon of Sunday and Monday morning the situation still was unresolved.

And this is the way that the Chavez regime care about the forgotten, the poors, the lowest part of the society? The most needed?

Who do you think are guilty of this situation of insecurity for this group of females in prison? Is there ANY reason on why this is happened but negligence from the Chavista government??

At least the communist Cubans or the Soviets wouldn't let something like this happen.

Where are Medea Benjamin and Cindy Sheehan when you need them?????

RCTV opens signal through Cable



Happens that yersterday RCTV opened its signal through Cable. Now it will open for many international people to watch. Many people were happy to see their beloved channel on te air again. But, unfortunately, for the most poors, for the BIG CHUNK of the Venezuelan population who cannot afford cable, they are left without the option to watch RCTV, for many, their only source of free entertrainment. And who's fault is this? You are right, none other that Hugo Chavez.

And then you tell me he works for the poor? I don't think so. Repressing a totally overworked poor population, whose life is full of problems, cannot go out at night because their neighboorhods are so violent (thanks again to the government who doesn'e enforce law) that they prefer to stay indoors to stay out of problems. Now they won't be able to watch RCTV. Thanks, Mr. President.

Something else, let's not forget that the government seized all transmition equipment who are a very expensive 53 years capital investment and haven't returned... for what reason?? The TV channel that occupies the free signal that belong to RCTV, channel TVES, has like 1% share or something like that, they have fired their reporter team like 3 times, and like we say in Venezuela, no da pié con bola. Well, my friends, the remote has spoken.

But, Chavez must be very mad to read this:

"Algunos vecinos sienten que han vuelto a esa época cuando llegó por primera vez la televisión al país. Un equipo era colocado en las calles y los vecinos se reunían alrededor de éste. Ahora, la diferencia es que los vecinos de un sector se reúnen en una misma casa. Esa situación se repite en Lomas de Urdaneta, en Catia y en San Agustín.

"Anoche llegó a mi casa el suegro de mi hermano, sus hijas y otros vecinos de mi bloque. En total eran más de 6 familias. Todos vimos Mi prima Ciela y Camaleona. La gente está contenta, pero me da cosa con muchos vecinos que no pueden adquirir este servicio. Creo que estamos retrocediendo. Imagínate, todos tenemos que ir a una misma casa para ver RCTV", señaló Edinson Rincon, habitante de Lomas de Urdaneta."

It says that people now gathered together in homes where they have the channel to share la telenovela with their neighbors and family, like the old times when TV appeared for the first time.

The last thing for herr kommandant left to do to force everybody to listen to him (obviously nobody is interested to hear him any longer), is to do what North Korean do, they have a radio fixed to all household living rooms in the country with propaganda 24/7, you cannot turn it OFF, the only thing you can do is lower the volume...

Monday, July 16, 2007

Not everything was soccer at the Copa América

I have been reading a little bit about the Copa América celebrated in Venezuela last week, a lot of things have been said like the tickets were monopolized and incredible hard to find for the citizens and also the conditions of the newly built stadiums were not totally completed, things about the organization, etc... honestly, nothing too extraordinary for our Venezuelan idiosyncrasy since, well, we are very far from been anal and organized like for example, Germans can be. Unfortunately, since I really don't follow soccer that much, only a few of the games were Brazil played, my favorite team (Venezuela is not a soccer country, it's a baseball country, although we do have a soccer team that has it very hard to classify for anything -they have to play against the monsters of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay- etc) and since I live on a galaxy far, far away from Venezuela, I really didn't know what happened that much inside the Copa... hence, my silence about it.

But, one thing I saw on the news this morning I want to point out that shows the blatant abuse one more time, mafiosi-ganster-gang-member style, of a Chavista official towards a private citizen.

This time, the abuser, is none other that Juan Barreto, Mayor of the metropolitan area of Caracas since 2004. The way he climbed into politics and was elected into this position are very questionable. The guy was elected on an electoral process that was controlled ONLY by Chavistas, that is, members of Barreto (and Chavez) same political party. Obviously, he won, like many other Chavistas like Barreto have climbed civil servant positions without having the real vote of the citizens but by controlling the electoral council and the electoral voting machines "smartmatic". Anyone who likes to read about mafia, organized crime and gangs knows exactly what I am talking about.


Barreto on the right. On the left, the Venezuelan version of Chancellor Palpatine, Jose Vicente Rangel.

Barreto is known for his beastly attitudes, this guys is certainly one of the most disgusting members of the Chavismo. He spit on Mayor Capriles-Radonski on a meeting of Mayors on October, 2006. But, there is more, he went against a female reporter like this, (see video below) (scroll to minute 1:52 to see the Mayor and the Chavista horde against the reporter), no words to describe this irrational and so resented behavior of this character. How Venezuela created people like him is the question we all should ask to ourselves.



Well, the incident with this gang member was on one of the semi-final games, between Uruguay and Mexico.

Video 1


Video 2


In this videos you can watch clips of what happened. On the first one, The reporter from Globovision is asking the mayor on the phone what really happened. And he said he was very happy, talking to the people, receiving kisses from the women in the public while he arrived (yeah right, he is very famous in Venezuela for joking publicly calling woman the only animal who bleed once a month and doesn't die, among other things, now you tell me what woman will blow kisses to this guy who, besides looking like Jabba The Hut, is clearly an open misogynist), people telling "I love you" and things like that. Funny thing is that you can hear on the clip people yelling on the back: "libertad, libertad". Then, according to the Mayor he heard a mentada de madre towards him. A mentada de madre is when somebody saying something like "el coño de tu madre". Spanish say "la puta que te parió", a little bit more explicit. In other words somebody is yelling to you that you are a SOB. To this, the official, turned himself to the guy who he tough yelled at him, went towards him, took of his cap with his hand, slapped his face (What's up with this guy slapping the face of another one? Touché? Did I miss the telenovela in which he was playing Hyacinth Bucket?!) and tried to take his cell phone (where he was talking pictures of Barreto) and then his bodyguard also went into the hands pushing the citizen out. You actually can see it on the video the bodyguard hitting the guy. Now, Barreto say that he didn't do anything to him but that he went nicely to ask him what was his problem, why he was insulting him and that the guy, who is a college professor by the way, punched him first.

In the second video you can tell that Barreto is lying because you can hear two witnesses, one from Uruguay and another from Mexico telling what they saw. The Mexican guy, by the way, was hit on his head by the repressive thugs. The reporter asked the professor what happened, the professor say that the crowd actually prevented the guards to take him out to the wishes of Barreto who, acting like The Pharaoh, asked them to take him out of the stadium immediately! The reporter then asks back the mayor what he says about this, and the mayor hangs off the phone.

The Uruguayan witness said that he is a reporter too, that he doesn't know who is this guy but that he saw a group of police who he though were coming to make peace but he was surprised when he saw the police coming ALSO to hit the professor. He said Barreto and the police behaved like patoteros (gang members). The Mexican said that he was scared because he was hit and he was told that they were waiting for him at the exit, he is asking on the TV for security, that he only came to Venezuela to enjoy a soccer game and to enjoy the country and that this abusive attitudes from the government were very unfortunate.

Now, this is on public, international TV, imagine what happens when the international cameras are not around.

Students who were protesting outside the stadium were taking on custody and released yesterday.

The professor who was hit by Barreto said that he wanted to pointed two things, one, the abuse of an official to a citizen, hitting him, and secondly, the power of the citizen, in this case the crowd, who prevented the guards to take the professor away, to the orders of the mayor. Some people were cheering "Valiente, valiente" (valiant) to the professor at the time of the incident.

UPDATE:

Note: Daniel also posted a note on this event.

Note 2: Miguel have the account on what happened outside with the students. 4 brothers decided to paint their hand in white (the simbol of the student protests) and hand in some sheet of paper saying something like "We want a fair game for Venezuela", they were taken into custody and charged with "incitation of hatred". But, as Daniel pointed out, surely what happened inside with the Mayor slapping on the face of one citizen just because doesn't incite hatred... uhmmm. This news won't stop here, this will bring noise.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Happy Birthday Venezuela! Wait a minute... happy?

Do we have something to celebrate after Hugo Chavez kidnapped my country from democracy and the rule of law? What are we celebrating? Personality cult towards a lunatic who thinks he is the new Pharaoh who crushes the will of the people at his wish? Bolivar must be upside down in his grave, that or having the laugh of his eternal life.


The big mouth on the back is none other than his... what else would you expect.

Independence
by Michael Rowan

Nine independence-days ago, in 1998, Hugo Chavez was campaigning for the presidency. If you were alive then, you will remember that he promised to liberate Venezuela from the corruption and poverty that had plundered the country and ravished its people for several decades, and people believed him. On election-day, Chavez won over half the vote and upon his inauguration a month later 90% of Venezuelans were supporting him and hoping he would succeed at doing what he promised.

Nine independence days later, Chavez has done a lot of things but most Venezuelans still struggle with poverty while corruption has become as common as a rotten mango in the street. In Venezuela today, there is hardly a power that Chavez does not control and there is hardly a bolivar that he does not spend or collect. Compared relatively to the elected leaders of the Americas, he is by a large margin the most powerful. So with all that power and money at his disposal, one would imagine that Chavez would be unhappy about such a sad performance for the people he serves, but he is not unhappy at all, he is delighted with himself.

Chavez has spent or committed $110 billion outside Venezuela since 2004 in various projects that support what he calls 21st century socialism. Compare that to the $120 billion - in today's dollars - that the United States spent in its Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after World War II. Whatever the virtues of spreading the revolution internationally might be, how that huge foreign fortune helps Venezuelans - especially those in the economic bottom half - is beyond this mind to imagine.

But what is even more amazing is how little internal party or government criticism there is of the Chavez failure to reduce poverty or corruption or of his spending twice as much in foreign lands as it would cost to lift every Venezuelan family out of poverty in a few years. This is proof of the fear his closest aides feel about telling Chavez the truth. On independence-day, 2007, some brave adviser of Chavez should have him read his 1999 inauguration speech and then ask him, "Are you the same Hugo Chavez who in 1999 wanted to liberate Venezuela from poverty and corruption, and what happened to him?" michaelrowan22@gmail.com

The American dream revisited

America just celebrated its 231 Birthday.



Is the American dream of progress and freedom dead? Certainly not for me, or others who want to pursue it. I meet my friend from Eastern Europe 11 years ago, he used to wait tables at that time and go to school too. Now, he is director of a very important multinational. He defines what you can do in America if you want to do it. Happy delayed Birthday America!

American dream is still alive for many but gauges of family wealth, happiness vary

By Peter Grier
Christian Science Monitor

If the American dream means doing better than your parents did, then Mike Brockman's not living it. Single, with a 10-year-old daughter, he's a server at a Black Angus restaurant in Mesa, Ariz. His father at his age had a good, steady job as a machinist at TRW.
Today "there aren't the kind of jobs available you used to get with a high school education, and work yourself up," says Brockman. "Now you have to have training or experience to start — then you can work your way up from there."
Norman Payne, on the other hand, thinks the American dream is alive and well. An immigrant from Panama, he's lived in the United States for 16 years — and on June 28 in Boston he was sworn in as a U.S. citizen.
Payne works in customer service at Kodak and has high hopes for his young son and daughter.
"I don't think the American dream has changed," he says. "I am trying to do everything I can do so that they can do better than I did."
Two hundred and thirty-one years after the 13 colonies declared their independence from Great Britain, is the United States still the land of opportunity, the light of hope for the poor of the world?
The economic dream that has united a diverse population for generations, that children would be more prosperous than their parents, is in question as perhaps never before.
Yet the nation's overall standard of living remains high. Immigrants both legal and illegal arrive every year by the tens of thousands, testament to the U.S. economy's continuing dynamism.
Overall, there is actually less economic mobility in the U.S. than in Canada and many European countries, notes John Morton, Managing Director, Program Planning and Economic Policy, for the Pew Charitable Trusts.
But for immigrants "the economic assimilation machine is in fact still very strong," says Morton, who is helping lead a long-term Pew project on the American dream's health.
The phrase "American dream" is relatively recent. It was popularized in the 1930s by historian James Truslow Adams, who in his day was a widely read author on the major themes and figures of the nation, similar to, say, David McCullough today.
Yet the idea expressed by the phrase, that the U.S. was a land of opportunity where generation after generation would keep doing better and better, has always been the "gyroscope of American life," writes Southern Methodist University political scientist Cal Jillson in his book "Pursuing the American Dream."
In some periods the American dream has seemed more attainable than in others, says Jillson. Most recently, it was alive and well in the era from the end of World War II through the early 1970s.
But since 1973, median family income has been essentially flat, says Jillson.
"This is one of those periods in American history when to many ... the American dream seems illusory," Jillson says.
Some polls back up this contention. In a recent CBS News survey of 17- to 29-year-olds, only 25 percent of respondents said their generation would be better off than their parents. Forty-eight percent said they would be worse off.
The American dream is "obsolete," says Adam Gandelman, a Boston bike messenger. "It's a scam."
Income figures show that the days are gone when a single, stable income, typically earned by the father, was enough to launch the next generation to greater prosperity, according to a Pew report on economic mobility released this spring.
Today, men in their 30s earn about $5,000 less in real terms than did their fathers' generation, according to Pew.
That fits with Brockman's experience. Neither he, nor his father, graduated from college. Nor did his grandmother, but she worked her way up from a secretarial position to the executive ranks at GE.
"I couldn't get the job my dad had at age 30 without a degree, or waiting in line for years," he says.
However, overall family income is a different story. Families with men in their 30s today have about $4,000 more in annual income than did their parents' generation.
"The main reason that family incomes have risen is that more women have gone to work, buttressing the incomes of men by adding a second earner," notes the Pew economic mobility report.
Katy Curtis, a real estate agent in north Scottsdale, Ariz., did not work when she was in the family-rearing stage of life. "And we survived quite well," she says.
But her two daughters, now in that thirty-something cohort, are finding life economically more difficult, she says.
They see new cars and plasma TVs and other accoutrements everywhere, and they want them, too. "I think there are more demands made upon them materialistically, and it's harder," says Curtis. "Things have gone up in price, and I don't think salaries are commensurate with that."
Some experts point out that income measures today are an inexact gauge of family well-being.
Cash, for example, is just one part of compensation. "Total compensation includes such increasingly important components of workers' pay as health benefits, contributions to retirement plans, and paid vacations," writes Heritage Foundation labor expert James Sherk in a recent analysis of economic mobility.
And the use of the Consumer Price Index to calculate inflation-adjusted pay is a mistake, according to Sherk. Economists should use the more accurate implicit price deflator instead.
"The result of this mistake is that wage growth will almost always appear to lag far behind productivity growth, even when workers are making gains," writes Sherk.
Nor does everyone judge the American dream to be purely based on monetary gain.
Mike Heitmann is a Kansas City resident visiting his wife's family in Boston, his four daughters in tow. "The American dream is having a strong family and living in a place where we have freedoms like we do in the U.S.," says Heitmann. "Family is the most important thing."
Wallace Sheppard will return to Iraq for his third tour there in October. The Army serviceman, based in Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, is also in Boston as a tourist.
"I define the American dream as being happy," he says. "Money doesn't really mater if you make enough to sustain your family."
And for the masses in many other parts of the world, whether they are huddled or not, the Statue of Liberty still stands as their dream destination.
Joseph Nemorin today is a line cook at Nick's Italian Restaurant on Ocean Drive in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. He's been there 17 years.
He arrived in the US from Haiti when he himself was 17. Today he is a legal permanent resident who says he has done better than his parents. He expects his children will do better than he has, because they were born in America.
The American dream is available for those who come to the US for the right reason, he says. "If you come to work, you don't get in trouble ... you should be doing fine, just like me."

Also: Revisiting the American dream

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Two for the price of one!



A member of the Revolutionary Guard stands under a picture of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez before the opening ceremony of the Methanol Joint Venture Project in Asalouyeh Seaport, 900 km (560 miles) southwest of Tehran, July 2, 2007. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi (IRAN)

God make them and they reunite.

Monday, July 02, 2007

Noticiero Digital's Director quit

Noticiero Digital (ND), one of the biggest forum about political news in Venezuela, is facing a systematic and direct attack from people who don't like they are so popular and so plural in their editorial line.

The original directors, Ana Diaz and Frank De Prada, left the country a while ago, since they couldn't keep up with the attacks and threats received by people not interested in this forum to stay alive. Now, his second director, Lic. Roger Santodomingo, received a pervert family threat,via his son's school... that is, his 8 year-old son was given a threat letter at his school. The details and the letter have not been revealed. He was very clear mentioning that he was gonna quit because his family's security is priority. He also said that this is not the first time this has happens, he was received letters and phone calls before.

The casual reader, who is not too well informed about Venezuela, would think, gee, why he doesn't left this to the police? Well, happens that the police in Venezuela is so politicized and so in tune with Mr. Chavez, that anything that want to think for itself, and doesn't lick the boots of the Chavismo is literary, the enemy. Mr. Santodomingo said he was going to file a complain on the fiscalia, the state prosecutor (we know he does it only to set the statement and for future records for when we will trial the chavismo crimes, but we know that they are not going to do anything).



Video courtesy of Plasmatico at youtube.

The mafiosi way of this criminal act will lead the reader to figure it out where the shots are coming from. They are so obvious to me, it's like they get their ideas from mafia stories and novels and The Sopranos, besides all they are absorbing from the communist Cubans. Criminals in a way, are all the same.

Mr. Santo Domingo said that he is tired of the Chavista propaganda campaign that describes Noticiero Digital forum as an employee paid by the US state's department (your truly also receives this comments in this blog on a regular basis... I am yet waiting for my CIA payroll check though).

Whoever follows up the disgusting Chavista TV shown "La Hojilla" (the blade) will tell you exactly the strong propaganda that chavismo has directed against Noticiero Digital.

Connect the dots and you will know where all of it is coming from and where it is leading. Yesterday is was RCTV, today is ND. It is so obvious this is all about the government wanting to eliminate all kind of independent news source that is not totally and abolutely controled by them.

This is case # 2,6785,453 in regards of the abuse of the Chavismo against the citizens of Veenzuela's freedom of speech's rights.

Totally taken by a french RAT, who knows how to cook...



Not everything is about politics... but there's a little bit of politics everywhere. In any case, I want to tell you, my dear readers, how much I enjoyed "Ratatouille", another wonderful movie by the fantastic combination and genius team of Disney-Pixar. It amazed me who come they could make such a wonderful film with such a disgusting topic. Think about it, rats, and rats in a kitchen of a restaurant. There's nothing impossible for the imagination. I have to say, when I think about what's my favorite movie, I always think about a good movie made the old fashion way. I never think of an animated movie (or these days, computer generated animation "CGI") as a favorite. But, truth to be told, I am totally cuckoo by animated films, hence my Internet "personality" is stolen from Nick Park's famous claymation film Wallace and Gromit, "The wrong trousers" character, Feathers McGraw... If you never have seen this movie, I highly recommended it. In addition to the successful "Wallace and Gromit" characters, Park also have an incredible funny series called "Creature Comforts" that it is really worth it to watch.



Now, Disney-Pixar wow... must say though that "Cars" is still my favorite of this group, but what a great job they have made with "Ratatouille", and also with "The Incredibles". Incredible. I forgot for a moment I was watching a CGI movie. I wonder how wonderful would be the future for CGI and how will it shape the movie industry. Say, in 20 years, maybe movies wouldn't need real actors. And you wouldn't even notice that they are not real people in them.



I wonder though, talking about politics, why they made Remy's accent (the protagonist rat) very American, when our little friend and the other rats were very "French"... funny is that the two evil characters have a very strong french accent... he he... oh well... I guess it's the little animation war between French and American in animation (think about "Les Triplettes de Belleville"'s depiction of the Americans in the movie). In any case, the movie looks with very good eyes the french culture, and how well they eat, and how bad Americans do.

Don't be surprize when you see some liberal animal loving group with a new slogan "Save the Rats" out there... he he... you will remember this post.